My view from the beginning was holding this virus back like they were would give it more chances to mutate into strains that could be more harmful… And the scientific community knows this so why were these lockdowns supported….
Steve Hufton1 hr ago The principal issue for the future is the fact that all coronavirus "inoculations" will always be unavoidably leaky. That is, because the entire coronavirus domain exhibits very high genetic drift (they mutate constantly), it is not possible to craft a vaccine that will prevent the virus transmission-replication-transmission cycle. In fact, efforts to inoculate large populations against genetically drifting virus species have been outlawed in American agriculture for decades. That is because of the likelihood of a very deadly outcome known as the Marek Effect, in which a virus strain, pressured by an aggressive but leaky vaccination campaign, mutates over time, eventually gaining two dangerous advantages: increased transmissibility and lethality. For an in-depth understanding, research Marek Effect.
It's not the mutations occurring because there was more chance (time) to mutate. It's mutations occurring under evolutionary pressure that cause the worst variants. A leaky (non-neutralizing) vaccine lets it be passed on while also creating the pressure to evolve because there is some impact on the virus. That pressure does not exist in unvaccinated individuals - the virus mutates because virus gonna virus, but not as harmfully. So it's a better plan to let the younger healthy generation freely contract and pass it on so the less virulent strain becomes the dominant one and people can more safely develop natural immunity. Geert Vanden Bossche discusses this extensively. It's why aiming for 100% mass vaccination, with a leaky vaccine during a pandemic, is the worst possible plan.
--------------------------- Call me the Breeze -------
October 21, 2021, 06:00
Mr Breeze
--------------------------- Call me the Breeze -------
October 22, 2021, 09:58
Mr Breeze
Well, it finally happened, I’m about to lose $20,000 in annual income. Just got my request for a vaccination certification to continue doing business with the government. Frankly, I have it better than a lot of other people that are taking a much bigger stand. I will not comply.
--------------------------- Call me the Breeze -------
October 22, 2021, 10:20
Webster
(((Mr. B.))) I think I've seen they may not be able to change contract terms mid-contract, that it would affect negotiations of new contracts. And maybe there will be enough uprising over the next couple months that this nonsense will go away.
October 22, 2021, 13:46
raisedbypoodles
quote:
I will not comply.
>>>
"LIVE! Life is a banquet and most poor suckers are starving to death. LIVE! LIVE! LIVE!" Auntie Mame
>>>
I never asked for trust funds. They were thrust upon me. Have pity.
